Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Solomon v. State

Solomon v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 14, 1922 · Broyles
29 Ga. App. 201; 114 S.E. 813; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 157

Solomon v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, O. J.

The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and the court therefore erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the special grounds of the motion.

Judgment reversed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Thomas & Walker, Benton Odom, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 16 Ga. App. 216; 22 Ga. App. 274; 26 Ga. App. 421; Id. 426 (3).

James R. Thomas, solicitor, W. B. Gills, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.