Solomon v. State
Solomon v. State
29 Ga. App. 201; 114 S.E. 813; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 157
Solomon v. State
Opinion of the Court
The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and the court therefore erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the special grounds of the motion.
Judgment reversed.
cited: 16 Ga. App. 216; 22 Ga. App. 274; 26 Ga. App. 421; Id. 426 (3).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.