Dixon v. State
Dixon v. State
29 Ga. App. 256; 114 S.E. 917; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 215
Dixon v. State
Opinion of the Court
Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court, the question whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict cannot be tested by direct exception, in the absence of a- motion for a new trial. See Schroeder v. Schroeder, 144 Ga. 119 (3) (86 S. E. 224). It follows that the verdict must stand and the judgment be affirmed.
■Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.