Jones v. State
Jones v. State
29 Ga. App. 286; 114 S.E. 916; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 253
Jones v. State
Opinion of the Court
The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt; and, the special grounds of the motion for a new trial not being argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, the judgment of the lower court refusing a new trial is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.