Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Jones v. State

Jones v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided December 12, 1922 · Bloodworth
29 Ga. App. 286; 114 S.E. 916; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 253

Jones v. State

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt; and, the special grounds of the motion for a new trial not being argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, the judgment of the lower court refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.