Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Walden v. State

Walden v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided January 11, 1923 · Broyles
29 Ga. App. 387; 115 S.E. 280; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 20

Walden v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contains the usual general grounds only. The evidence relied upon for a conviction, while circumstantial, is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.