Rainey v. McFarland
Rainey v. McFarland
29 Ga. App. 494; 115 S.E. 925; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 88
Rainey v. McFarland
Opinion of the Court
Although the plaintiff in error, who was defendant in the trial court, recites in his bill of exceptions that a verdict adverse to him was by the court directed, the sole assignment of error is upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial, which contained the general grounds only; and, since the evidence did not demand a verdict in his favor, such judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.