Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Cartersville Grocery Co. v. Elk Manufacturing & Commission Co.

Cartersville Grocery Co. v. Elk Manufacturing & Commission Co.
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided March 6, 1923 · Bloodworth
30 Ga. App. 4; 117 S.E. 111; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 205

Cartersville Grocery Co. v. Elk Manufacturing & Commission Co.

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

When the entire charge is considered in the light of all the facts of the case, there is nothing in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, based upon alleged errors in the charge of the court, or in the refusal to charge, that requires the grant of a new trial; for no reason assigned in the other grounds of the motion is a new trial demanded, and,,as there is evidence to support the finding of the jury, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Luke, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.