Bell v. State
Bell v. State
30 Ga. App. 4; 116 S.E. 543; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 206
Bell v. State
Opinion of the Court
The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; and the evidence, while circumstantial, being sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, the judgment of the court overruling the 'motion for a new trial cannot be controlled.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.