Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Forster v. Malone

Forster v. Malone
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided March 8, 1923 · Luke
30 Ga. App. 75; 116 S.E. 560; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 256

Forster v. Malone

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

There was evidence to authorize the verdict in this ease, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial which complain of the charge of the court are without merit. The charge of the court was full, fair, and properly adjusted to the pleadings and the evidence. Tor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodixorth, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.