Roberts v. State
Roberts v. State
30 Ga. App. 185; 117 S.E. 99; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 339
Roberts v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. Under all the particular facts of the case it does not appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance.
2. There was evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction. The verdict has the approval of the trial judge. It u'as not error, for any reason assigned, to overrule the motion for a new trial.
■Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.