Dial v. State
Dial v. State
30 Ga. App. 265; 117 S.E. 775; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 387
Dial v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was accused and convicted of the offense of malicious mischief. The sole assignment of error is that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. This court cannot say that there was no evidence to authorize the verdict. The trial judge having approved the verdict, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.