Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Pless v. State

Pless v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided May 15, 1923 · Broyles
30 Ga. App. 277; 117 S.E. 770; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 399

Pless v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

The bill of exceptions shows that two separate cases against the same defendant were by agreement tried together; that there were two separate verdicts of guilty, two separate judgments, *278two separate motions for a new trial, and two separate orders overruling the motions. The defendant seeks in this bill of exceptions to have both of these judgments reversed. This cannot be done. Fillingame v. State, 27 Ga. App. 764 (109 S. E. 916); Bridges v. State, 27 Ga. App. 767 (110 S. E. 412).

Decided May 15, 1923. II. A. Allen, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑