Rauschenberg v. Peeples
Georgia Court of Appeals
Rauschenberg v. Peeples, 30 Ga. App. 384 (1923)
118 S.E. 409; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 486
Bell, Jenkins, Stephens
Rauschenberg v. Peeples
Opinion of the Court
Applying the principles announced in the headnotes, there was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the part of the amendment set forth in the statement of the facts. It follows that none of the rulings or charges were erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The general grounds of the motion are not referred to in the brief, and therefore are treated as abandoned.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- RAUSCHENBERG v. PEEPLES
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published