Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Rauschenberg v. Peeples

Rauschenberg v. Peeples
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided June 25, 1923 · Bell, Jenkins, Stephens
30 Ga. App. 384; 118 S.E. 409; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 486

Rauschenberg v. Peeples

Opinion of the Court

Bell, J.

Applying the principles announced in the headnotes, there was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the part of the amendment set forth in the statement of the facts. It follows that none of the rulings or charges were erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The general grounds of the motion are not referred to in the brief, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.