Rauschenberg v. Peeples

Georgia Court of Appeals
Rauschenberg v. Peeples, 30 Ga. App. 384 (1923)
118 S.E. 409; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 486
Bell, Jenkins, Stephens

Rauschenberg v. Peeples

Opinion of the Court

Bell, J.

Applying the principles announced in the headnotes, there was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the part of the amendment set forth in the statement of the facts. It follows that none of the rulings or charges were erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The general grounds of the motion are not referred to in the brief, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
RAUSCHENBERG v. PEEPLES
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published