King v. State
King v. State
30 Ga. App. 562; 118 S.E. 702; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 529
King v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. The court erred in refusing to exclude the evidence as to the defendant’s confession, there being evidence that the confession was induced by some slight hope of benefit or some remote fear of injury. King v. State (this case), 155 Ga. 707 (118 S. E. 368). See 28 Ga. App. 751.
2. The other special grounds of the motion for a new trial are either without merit or show errors which are not likely to recur upon retrial.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.