Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Golightly v. Tatum

Golightly v. Tatum
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 10, 1923 · Luke
30 Ga. App. 594; 118 S.E. 501; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 541

Golightly v. Tatum

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

This ease is here upon the sole assignment of .error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. There was evidence to authorize the verdict in favor of the defendant, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. It was therefore not error to overrule the motion for a new tiral.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.