Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Hunter v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 10, 1923 · Broyles

30 Ga. App. 615; 118 S.E. 704; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 560

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, U. J.

The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the evidence, direct and circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the jury to return the verdict rendered, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. W. G. Post, for plaintiff in error. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-gen eral, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.