Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Hill v. State

Hill v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 10, 1923 · Broyles
30 Ga. App. 619; 118 S.E. 608; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 566

Hill v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, O. J.

The testimony of the accomplice was sufficiently corroborated by the other facts and circumstance’s of the case; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.