Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Golightly v. Reeves

Golightly v. Reeves
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided October 3, 1923 · Bloodworth
30 Ga. App. 785; 119 S.E. 432; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 686

Golightly v. Reeves

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case contains no special grounds. “ Under the facts as disclosed by the record, this court cannot say that the verdict of the jury is without support from the testimony or so far contrary to it as to authorize this court to determine that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial. The law allows him to refuse or grant new trials in the exercise of a legal discretion, but *786it does not give this court any discretion in the matter. It can only grant new trials when errors of law have been committed, or when the trial judge has abused his discretion in refusing a new trial.” Smith v. State, 91 Ga. 188 (17 S. E. 68).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.