Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Ray v. State

Ray v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 13, 1923 · Bboyles
31 Ga. App. 119; 120 S.E. 704; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 769

Ray v. State

Opinion of the Court

Bboyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; and, while some errors were committed upon the trial, none of them, under the particular facts of the case, requires a new trial. The overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Paul L. Lindsay, for plaintiff in error. Boy Dorsey, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.