Hair v. State
Hair v. State
31 Ga. App. 177; 120 S.E. 35; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 820
Hair v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon. His motion for a new trial, which was based upon the general grounds only, was overruled. The evidence was in conflict, but the jury believed, as they had a right to do, the evidence of the State, which authorized the defendant’s conviction. The trial judge approved the verdict. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.