Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Bailey v. Gardner

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided December 5, 1923 · Luke

31 Ga. App. 292; 120 S.E. 704; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 894

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

1. The evidence was conflicting, and the judgment will not be reversed upon the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of alleged errors in the introduction of evidence, in the court’s charge, and of the failure to- charge, contain no reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur. Albert Kemper, A. L. Henson, for plaintiff. J. G. B. Brwin, for defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.