Georgia Court of Appeals, 1923

Widincamp v. Glennville Bank

Widincamp v. Glennville Bank
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided December 7, 1923 · Bell
31 Ga. App. 387; 120 S.E. 665; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 956

Widincamp v. Glennville Bank

Opinion of the Court

Bell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The answer failed to show that the note sued on was without consideration. The defendant was originally liable on the note of anpther as indorser and thi§ liability furnished a consideration in *388succession for each of the notes given thereafter in renewal. Also the plea was insufficient as a plea of fraud. Sasser v. McGovern, 11 Ga. App. 88 (74 S. E. 797); Haymans v. Bennett, 29 Ga. App. 265 (114 S. E. 923); Tennille Banking Co. v. Ward, 29 Ga. App. 660 (116 S. E. 347).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.