Widincamp v. Glennville Bank

Georgia Court of Appeals
Widincamp v. Glennville Bank, 31 Ga. App. 387 (1923)
120 S.E. 665; 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 956
Bell

Widincamp v. Glennville Bank

Opinion of the Court

Bell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The answer failed to show that the note sued on was without consideration. The defendant was originally liable on the note of anpther as indorser and thi§ liability furnished a consideration in *388succession for each of the notes given thereafter in renewal. Also the plea was insufficient as a plea of fraud. Sasser v. McGovern, 11 Ga. App. 88 (74 S. E. 797); Haymans v. Bennett, 29 Ga. App. 265 (114 S. E. 923); Tennille Banking Co. v. Ward, 29 Ga. App. 660 (116 S. E. 347).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
WIDINCAMP v. GLENNVILLE BANK
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published