Sampson v. State
Sampson v. State
32 Ga. App. 76; 122 S.E. 739; 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 271
Sampson v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. In view of the note of the trial judge this court cannot say that the overruling of the motion for continuance was error.
2. The verdicr was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.
•Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.