Joe v. State
Joe v. State
32 Ga. App. 326; 123 S.E. 49; 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 368
Joe v. State
Opinion of the Court
The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction. There being no insistence upon the special assignments of error in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, and the trial judge having approved the finding of the jury, there is no legal reason why the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial should be set aside.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.