Brown v. State
Brown v. State
32 Ga. App. 355; 123 S.E. 49; 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 393
Brown v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. The exclusion of certain love letters that the female alleged to have been seduced by the defendant wrote to á third person after the alleged seduction was not error. See, in this connection, Keller v. State, 102 Ga. 506 (7) (31 S. E. 92); Davis v. State, 31 Ga. App. 523 (3) (121 S. E. 136).
2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.