Georgia Court of Appeals, 1924

Rounsaville v. Lamb

Rounsaville v. Lamb
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided June 10, 1924 · Bloodwobth
32 Ga. App. 403; 123 S.E. 723; 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 421

Rounsaville v. Lamb

Opinion of the Court

Bloodwobth, J.

1. When the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial are considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, there is no error in any of them that requires the grant of a new trial.

2. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jnry; no error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial of the case; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.