Marshall v. Royal Insurance
Marshall v. Royal Insurance
Opinion of the Court
1. There being no brief of the evidence in the record in this case, it is impossible ■¡for this court to consider the general grounds of the motion for a new trial and an exception to the direction of a verdict, which are the only grounds relied upon by the plaintiff in error.
2. Since it appears from the certificate of the clerk of the trial court that no brief of the evidence is on file in his office, and that therefore it is impossible for a brief of the evidence to be transmitted to this court, it
Writ of error dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.