Georgia Court of Appeals, 1924

McEntyre v. State

McEntyre v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 12, 1924 · Luke
33 Ga. App. 54; 125 S.E. 766; 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 716

McEntyre v. State

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

The ionvietion was dependent wholly upon circumstantial evidence, and the evidence was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. It was therefore error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. - J ames Maddox, solicitor, cohtra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.