Brockett v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals
Brockett v. State, 33 Ga. App. 57 (1924)
125 S.E. 513; 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 718
Broyles

Brockett v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In our opinion the slot machine as operated by the defendant was a gambling device, within the meaning 'of the statute. Meyer v. State, 112 Ga. 20 (37 S. E. 96, 51 L. R. A. 496, 81 Am. St. Rep. 17), and authorities cited; Alexander v. Atlanta, 13 Ga. App. 354 (79 S. E. 177).

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
BROCKETT v. State
Cited By
12 cases
Status
Published