Georgia Court of Appeals, 1924

Bugg v. Overstreet

Bugg v. Overstreet
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided December 9, 1924 · Luke
33 Ga. App. 169; 125 S.E. 734; 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 798

Bugg v. Overstreet

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

The ground based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, not being referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, must be treated as abandoned.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires another hearing of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. W. B. Bennel, Brie B. Askew, for plaintiff in error. J. S. Ridgdill, R. D. Smith, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.