Georgia Court of Appeals, 1925

Henderson v. National Bank

Henderson v. National Bank
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided May 14, 1925 · Luke
34 Ga. App. 34; 128 S.E. 16; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 16

Henderson v. National Bank

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

The sole contention of the plaintiff in error is that the verdict was not authorized by the evidence. Upon conflicting evidence the jury, as was their province, decided the issue of fact against the claimant. The verdict being supported by evidence, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.