Henderson v. National Bank
Henderson v. National Bank
34 Ga. App. 34; 128 S.E. 16; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 16
Henderson v. National Bank
Opinion of the Court
The sole contention of the plaintiff in error is that the verdict was not authorized by the evidence. Upon conflicting evidence the jury, as was their province, decided the issue of fact against the claimant. The verdict being supported by evidence, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.