Georgia Court of Appeals, 1925

Dimond v. Shackelford

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided June 9, 1925 · Bloodwortii

34 Ga. App. 137; 129 S.E. 22; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 75

Opinion of the Court

Bloodwortii, J.

1. The court did not err in any of the rulings relating to the pleadings, of which error is alleged in the exceptions pendente lite.

*138Decided June 9, 1925. Rehearing denied July 14, 1925. W. I. & P. Z. Geer, for plaintiff in error. J. Q. Hale, contra.

2. None of fclie special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows any reason why. the judgment of the trial court should be reversed.

3'. A verdict for the full amount sued for was properly directed.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.