Roberts v. Selman
Roberts v. Selman
34 Ga. App. 171; 128 S.E. 694; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 110
Roberts v. Selman
Opinion of the Court
The pauper’s affidavit made to obtain the writ of certiorari should allege that owing to his poverty the affiant is unable to give the required security; and where the allegation is merely that the affiant “is unable to give the security, as required by law,” the writ of certiorari (if issued) is void, the affidavit not being amendable, and the certiorari proceedings should be dismissed. Civil Code (1910), § 5187; Hackett v. Tate, 18 Ga. App. 453 (89 S. E. 535), and citations; Belk v. Cannon, 19 Ga. App. 487 (2) (91 S. E. 790), and citation.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.