Georgia Court of Appeals, 1925

Clay v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided June 20, 1925 · Bloodworth

34 Ga. App. 175; 128 S.E. 438; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 118

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

1. Under the facts of this case the court did not err, in the absence of a timely and legal written request therefor, either in failing to charge the jury “the law relating to circumstantial evidence” or “in failing to charge the law of alibi.”

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoncwr.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.