City National Bank v. Bridges
City National Bank v. Bridges
34 Ga. App. 178; 128 S.E. 694; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 122
City National Bank v. Bridges
Opinion of the Court
1. Where the judge has finally passed on the merits of a motion for a new trial, the question as to the sufficiency of the approval of the grounds of the motion will not be entertained by the reviewing court, unless it was first raised and insisted upon before the trial judge. Ga. L. 1911, § 3, p. .150.
2. The excerpts from the charge of the court which are complained of, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole and the facts of the case, disclose no material error.
3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.