Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Georgia Court of Appeals, 1925

Sellman v. State

Sellman v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 14, 1925 · Luke
34 Ga. App. 189; 129 S.E. 22; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 138

Sellman v. State

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted of the oifense of simple larceny. The evidence did not authorize the conviction of the defendants upon the indictment. Eor this reason the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Broyles, O. J., dissents. Scott, Hornbuclcle & Moore, for plaintiffs in error. John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, 1L A. Stephens, Ralph H. Pharr, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑