Georgia Court of Appeals, 1925

Ray v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 29, 1925 · Bloodworth

34 Ga. App. 235; 128 S.E. 819; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 185

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that requires a rehearing of this ease.

*236Decided July 29, 1925. Smith & Watson, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Griffith, solicitor-general, contra.

2. There is some evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.