Dozier v. Thomas
Dozier v. Thomas
34 Ga. App. 445; 129 S.E. 798; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 301
Dozier v. Thomas
Opinion of the Court
The evidence amply authorized the verdict.
Upon the authority of Sanders v. Ayers, 155 Ga. 630 (117 S. E. 651), and under the particular facts of this case, the assignments of error upon the admission of parol evidence to explain the indorsement by Thomas, who was sued as indorser of the notes, show no reversible error. For none of the reasons pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.