Georgia Court of Appeals, 1925

Rushing v. State

Rushing v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 11, 1925 · Luke
34 Ga. App. 525; 130 S.E. 358; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 386

Rushing v. State

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case amply authorized the conviction. The conviction not being wholly dependent upon circumstantial evidence, and there being no request to charge thereon, the assignment of error upon the ground that the judge did not charge the law of circumstantial evidence is without merit. Eor no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloockoorth, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.