Georgia Court of Appeals, 1925

Fulton National Bank v. Redmond

Fulton National Bank v. Redmond
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided December 15, 1925 · Broyles
34 Ga. App. 667; 130 S.E. 832; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 464

Fulton National Bank v. Redmond

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in this case (161 Ga. —, 130 S. E. 568), the trial court erred in admitting evidence as complained of in the bill of exceptions, and, under the facts of the ease, the verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant were contrary to law and the legal evidence. In compliance with this ruling it is ordered that the former judgment of this court (33 Ga. App. 122) be vacated, and the judgment below is

Reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, William Matthews, for plaintiff. McDaniel & Neely, for defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.