Veal v. Huffman
Veal v. Huffman
34 Ga. App. 675; 130 S.E. 704; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 479
Veal v. Huffman
Opinion of the Court
1. The court did not err in any of its rulings on the pleadings on which error was assigned in the exceptions pendente lite.
2. In no ground of the motion for a new trial is there any error that requires another hearing of the case.
3. The verdict is not lacking in evidence to support it.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.