Georgia Court of Appeals, 1925

Woodall v. Farmers Bank

Woodall v. Farmers Bank
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided December 15, 1925 · Brotles
34 Ga. App. 680; 130 S.E. 832; 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 483

Woodall v. Farmers Bank

Opinion of the Court

Brotles, O. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodnoorth, JJ., concur. Reagan & Reagan, for plaintiffs in error. E. 0. Dobbs, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.