Georgia Court of Appeals, 1926

Sorrow v. State

Sorrow v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided March 3, 1926 · Broyles
35 Ga. App. 201; 132 S.E. 272; 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 630

Sorrow v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial is based upon the usual general grounds only; the verdict is authorized by the evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Berry T. Moseley, for plaintiff in error. A. S. Slcelton, solicitor-general, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.