Selman v. Arp
Selman v. Arp
35 Ga. App. 242; 132 S.E. 781; 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 659
Selman v. Arp
Opinion of the Court
The verdict for the plaintiff, who sued for services rendered in nursing, waiting upon, and attending the defendant’s intestate, was authorized; and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, which complain of the admission of testimony over the objection of plaintiff in error, are without merit. Eor no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.