Georgia Court of Appeals, 1926

Selman v. Arp

Selman v. Arp
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided April 14, 1926 · Luke
35 Ga. App. 242; 132 S.E. 781; 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 659

Selman v. Arp

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

The verdict for the plaintiff, who sued for services rendered in nursing, waiting upon, and attending the defendant’s intestate, was authorized; and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, which complain of the admission of testimony over the objection of plaintiff in error, are without merit. Eor no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., concurs. Bloodworih, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.