Georgia Court of Appeals, 1926

Hutto v. State

Hutto v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided May 12, 1926 · Bloodwoetii
35 Ga. App. 364; 133 S.E. 105; 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 352

Hutto v. State

Opinion of the Court

Bloodwoetii, J.

1. There is no merit in either of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, or in any of the assignments of error in the bill of exceptions.

2. The evidence is ample to support the verdict. Although circumstantial, it is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.