Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
35 Ga. App. 402; 134 S.E. 188; 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 399
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. The evidence connecting the accused with the offense charged, while circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.
2. Ground 1 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, not having
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.