1. No error was committed when the motion to continue was overruled.

2. Each ground of a motion for a new trial should be complete and understandable within itself; should of itself show error. Neither of the grounds of the motion based on the admission of evidence does this. There was no error in refusing a new trial on 'either of the grounds of the motion complaining of the admission of evidence.

3. There is ample evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.