McKinney v. Chapman
McKinney v. Chapman
37 Ga. App. 174; 139 S.E. 98; 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 565
McKinney v. Chapman
Opinion of the Court
1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial shows no reason why the case should be tried again.
2. Juries are the final arbiters on all questions of fact. In this case the conflicting evidence was settled by the jury in favor of the plaintiff, and, no error of law having been committed on the trial, the verdict must stand.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.