Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Georgia Court of Appeals, 1927

Stoddard v. Churchill Line

Stoddard v. Churchill Line
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 16, 1927 · Broyles
37 Ga. App. 347; 140 S.E. 778; 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 668

Stoddard v. Churchill Line

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

The ease, by consent of both parties, was submitted to the court, without the intervention of a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts, and the court did not err in rendering a judgment in favor of the defendant, or thereafter in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe <md Bloodworth, JJ., concur. H. Mercer Jordan, Robert L. Golding, for plaintiff, cited: 128 Ga. 628 (4); Id. 695; 15 Ga. App. 678 (2); 141 Ga. 565 (2). Stephens & Stephens, for defendant, cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4266, 4227; 16 Ga. App. 636.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑