Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Georgia Court of Appeals, 1928

Day v. State

Day v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided December 11, 1928 · Bloodworth
39 Ga. App. 71; 146 S.E. 774; 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 511

Day v. State

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in either of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. Tire evidence in this case is such as to bring it within the ruling in Yonce v. State, 154 Ga. 419 (114 S. E. 325), 29 Ga. App. 173 (114 S. E. 584) ; and the judge of the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke,'J., concur. J. P. Brooke, G. B. Walker, H. B. Moss, for plaintiff in error. George D. Anderson, solicitor-general, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑