Georgia Court of Appeals, 1929

Friedlander v. Feingold

Friedlander v. Feingold
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided March 5, 1929 · Bloodworth
39 Ga. App. 410; 147 S.E. 535; 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 342

Friedlander v. Feingold

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are based on alleged errors in the charge of the court. We find no error in any of the instructions complained of. The charge given was clear and correct.

2. The evidence supports the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the case, and a. new trial was properly refused.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.